tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post5448090632937913490..comments2024-03-17T01:48:59.504-07:00Comments on The Theropod Database Blog: Validity of NanotyrannusMickey Mortimerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08831823442911513851noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-86250810230081382042013-12-30T01:53:00.578-08:002013-12-30T01:53:00.578-08:00I'm sorry to ask more questions, but what abou...I'm sorry to ask more questions, but what about "Dinotyrannus" specimen scapular size?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14895909393357396647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-71628472979359122912013-12-27T04:28:17.307-08:002013-12-27T04:28:17.307-08:00Thanks a ton!Thanks a ton!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14895909393357396647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-59088967009636344242013-12-27T03:38:12.827-08:002013-12-27T03:38:12.827-08:00109 mm, taken about 28% down the bone from the pro...109 mm, taken about 28% down the bone from the proximal end. For comparison, Sue's is listed as 205 mm.Mickey Mortimerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08831823442911513851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-2585205501180321792013-12-27T03:28:34.761-08:002013-12-27T03:28:34.761-08:00Sorry again, but can you tell me the “Jane” scapul...Sorry again, but can you tell me the “Jane” scapula circumference then?<br />I don't own the book..Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14895909393357396647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-51563119743384405762013-12-27T03:16:23.399-08:002013-12-27T03:16:23.399-08:00Then.. There are no infos of preserved bone length...Then.. There are no infos of preserved bone length? <br />Anyways Thanks a lot for the answering!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14895909393357396647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-27599213206100759102013-12-27T02:58:29.938-08:002013-12-27T02:58:29.938-08:00I'm betting the distal portion is missing. La...I'm betting the distal portion is missing. Larson (2008- table 8.5) only lists a circumference, not a length, there is a notable crack two-thirds down in Larson's (2013- fig. 2.5A) photo of the mounted specimen and his drawing of the distal end differs from this photo but matches that of his Tyrannosaurus drawing (fig. 2.5 B).Mickey Mortimerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08831823442911513851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-63213015911835322832013-12-27T02:24:21.359-08:002013-12-27T02:24:21.359-08:00Sorry for the questions, but can you tell me how l...Sorry for the questions, but can you tell me how long “Jane” scapular bone is?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14895909393357396647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-27280684451039978062013-09-30T04:44:37.656-07:002013-09-30T04:44:37.656-07:00Great to have you back and blogging, Ms. Mortimer!...Great to have you back and blogging, Ms. Mortimer!<br />Also, wonderful to hear that the Lori analysis is still inching towards publication :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3248412803814730250.post-13812762822645911892013-09-29T03:05:18.421-07:002013-09-29T03:05:18.421-07:00The Lori paper! That's something I'm very ...The Lori paper! That's something I'm very interested to :-)<br />Andrea Cauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10855060597677361866noreply@blogger.com